Archive for September, 2009

Weekly Web Watch 09/21/09 – 09/27/09

September 29, 2009
Gen. Stanley McChrystal

Gen. Stanley McChrystal

The White House is considering a drastic change in Afghanistan strategy, according to the New York Times.  President Obama is, apparently, exploring the feasibility of drawing down the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and getting out of Afghani politics, leaving the Taliban alone in order to focus exclusively on al-Qaeda.  Gen. Stanley McChrystal, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, sent a memo to the President warning that, if he does not receive more troops, the mission in Afghanistan is doomed to failure.  The memo is available here (.pdf).  Dave Schuler points out that, under conventional counter-insurgency doctrine, more than 400,000 troops are necessary to secure Afghanistan.  Spencer Ackerman finds that figure in the memo and reminds us that Afghanistan is supposed to supply at least that many troops and police to the effort.  And Andrew Exum points out that counter-insurgency tactics will increase the number of U.S. casualties.  If you visit that link, however, be aware that Exum has several other posts up with arguments and links supporting a counter-insurgency strategy.

The Justice Department concluded that Congress does not need to pass additional legislation regarding the detention of alleged terrorists.  The DoJ claims that the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force provides the administration all the detention power that it requires.  Adam Serwer points out that this is considered a victory for civil libertarians.  Meanwhile, the administration is preparing to miss the self-imposed deadline for the closure of the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.

President Obama delivered a speech to the U.N. on Wednesday.  Reaction to the speech has been fairly quiet.  The New York Times was pleased by the greater multilateralism on display, but concerned about the absence of any discussion of Afghanistan.

William Schambra penned an essay claiming that many of President Obama’s political problems can be traced to his affinity for large-scale policy proposals.  David Broder read the essay and pushed it to a wider audience, claiming that Schambra’s analysis pinpoints why Obama’s is unlikely to be a successful presidency.  Joe Klein takes issue with this and accuses Broder of being overly selective with his historical examples.  Stephen Griffin offers additional thoughts, including ways to amend the Constitutional structure in order to make this type of large-scale policymaking easier.

(more…)

Executive Action Report: 09/16/2009-09/22/2009

September 23, 2009

Wednesday, September 16

  • The White House responded to criticism of its policy of appointing “czars” to oversee specific policy areas. A blog post on the White House website points out that many of the “czars” also existed in the Bush Administration, and that several critics of the practice had voiced support for “czars” in the past.
  • President Obama said that he will not make a “quick decision” about whether to send additional troops to Afghanistan. Military leaders in Afghanistan and at the Pentagon have called for increasing the number of troops in order to conduct a broader counterinsurgency campaign.

Thursday, September 17

  • President Obama announced a shift in United States missile defense policy. The new policy will rely on ship-based missile systems to combat the threat posed by intermediate range missiles launched from Iran. This replaces the Bush Administration’s policy of land-based missiles located in Eastern European countries, a policy that Russia had sharply criticized.

Friday, September 18

(more…)

Weekly Web Watch 09/14/09 – 09/20/09

September 21, 2009

The Obama administration decided to scrap the Bush administration’s plans for missile defense systems in Poland and the Czech Republic.  Defense Secretary Robert Gates gave more information about the season in a press conference, implicitly rebuking those who claimed this was more about politics than defense.  The New York Times put together a selection of responses to the news.  John Noonan reinforces the point that the old system was about future capabilities, not about present threats.  Nathan Hodge is one of several who points out that announcing this decision on the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland was not the most politically astute move.  And Thomas Joscelyn follows up on the “updated intelligence” reports that led to the decision.

Last week, we noted that the Obama administration was putting in new procedures at Bagram AFB allowing detainees to challenge their detention.  As more details have emerged, however, reaction to this development seems to have shifted.  Spencer Ackerman, Glenn Greenwald, and Alex Knapp all weigh in with some variation of “this replicates Guantanamo at Bagram.”  Ackerman has the best quote: David Remes from Appeal for Justice says that the administration is replicating the Combatant Status Review Tribunals with the new order.  Greenwald points out that these new guidelines were issued one day before the DoJ appealed a ruling (.pdf) that interpreted Boumediene to extend habeas corpus rights to Bagram detainees.

The Obama administration delivered to Congress a document that, it says, lays out metrics to determine victory in Afghanistan.  Foreign Policy managed to acquire and post the entire document.  Spencer Ackerman offers the Cliffs Notes version.  Early reaction seems almost entirely negative, because the “metrics” read more like mission statements than measurable goals.  The Economist has the most disgusted reaction, saying that the document is disappointing and confusing.  Dave Schuler is also unimpressed, calling it a “wishlist” instead of a strategy.  Fred Kagan defends, if not the metrics themselves, at least the thinking behind them.

The Obama administration proposed the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), engendering pushback from several interest groups.  The CFPA would regulate businesses that extend credit to consumers in a wide range of products, including credit cards and mortgages.  Joshua Wright and Todd Zywicki have an essay up that argues that the CFPA is a knee-jerk response to the financial crisis that fundamentally misunderstands what led to the breakdown in financial markets.  Their key argument is that the problem was not the consumers but rather the lenders.  Ilya Somin piles on, arguing that the agency will lead to less (or less effective) consumer protection.  Obama advisor Larry Summers has fired back, accusing business groups of using “scare tactics” like the infamous “death panels” used against health-care reform.  Meanwhile, Judge Jed Rakoff angrily disapproved of a settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Bank of America that, he said, would allow both of those organizations to profit by BofA’s wrongdoing at shareholders’ expense.

Several provisions of the PATRIOT Act are up for renewal, and several Democratic senators are promising to fight for expanded protection of civil liberties.  Julian Sanchez, who wants reform of the PATRIOT Act, has the full text of proposed changes here (.pdf).

(more…)

Weekly Web Watch 09/07/09 – 09/13/09

September 15, 2009

President Obama gave a speech outlining his new health-care reform proposal.  The highlight of the evening, at least for reporters, was Rep. Joe Louis shouting “You lie!” at the president after Obama stated that illegal aliens would not be covered.  Reaction was immediate and Louis apologized the next day.  Despite some claims, heckling the president is not unprecedented.  James Joyner defends Louis, saying that the Democrats’ plan will wind up covering illegal aliens, even if it is not explicitly supposed to do so.  Alex Massie is uninterested in health care, but the British writer is fascinated by a country that staged a revolution to overthrow a king, only to demand that everyone treat the president like a monarch.  Relatedly, Obama is offering to put tort reform into the health-care bill, though he would use a former trial lawyer lobbyist to do so.

President Obama imposed a thirty-five percent tariff on tire imports from China.  He did so under a section of the law that allows the President to unilaterally impose tariffs to prevent “surges” of foreign goods.  The Financial Times reports that China is already threatening to escalate the incident into a trade war by slapping tariffs on U.S. poultry and cars.

The men who attempted to blow airliners up with liquid explosives were convicted in the U.KChannel 4 reports that they were caught using NSA wiretaps.  Glenn Greenwald notes, however, that those wiretaps were authorized by the FISA.

Saturday saw the largest rally yet against President Obama.  The number of protesters is still unknown; most sources report 1-1.5 million people attended; outliers range from 2 million to 60,000.  One thing most observers agree on is that there was no unifying theme to the protesters aside from their dislike of Obama’s policies.

The U.S. invaded Somalia.  Again.

(more…)

Executive Action Report: 09/02/2009-09/08/2009

September 9, 2009

Wednesday, September 2

  • President Obama will address a joint session of Congress next Wednesday. The address will attempt to build momentum for the President’s health care reform proposals.
  • The State Department announced that former Senator George Mitchell will return to the Middle East next week. Senator Mitchell, the Administration’s special envoy for Mideast peace, met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York over the weekend.
  • President Obama will chair a session of the United Nations Security Council focusing on nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament. The session will concentrate on broad goals rather than specific problems presented by countries like North Korea. This will be the first time a President of the United States has chaired a session of the Council.

Thursday, September 3

  • The Department of Health and Human Services announced the reappointment of John Howard as the coordinator for health issues related to the September 11 Attacks. Mr. Howard served in this capacity from 2006 to 2008, but the Bush Administration chose not to renew his position following disagreements over health policy.
  • The White House announced that President Obama intends to nominate Michael Punke to be U.S. ambassador to the World Trade Organization. Mr. Punke is a novelist and history professor who served as White House director for International Economic Affairs from 1993 to 1995.

(more…)

Weekly Web Watch 08/31/09 – 09/06/09

September 7, 2009

The CIA has asked the Department of Justice to start an investigation into the leak about the CIA’s assassination program.  Also, interestingly, the head of Xe (formerly Blackwater) has been placed on al-Qaeda’s “most wanted” list.

Stuart Holder argues that John Durham’s probe of CIA interrogations is political theater.  Holder argues that the investigation meets the U.S. requirements under the UN Convention Against Torture, but that actual prosecutions would be “political suicide.”  The Economist argues that the U.S. is always just one terror attack away from becoming Dick Cheney.

President Obama plans to give a speech to schoolchildren next week.  Some critics are urging their readers to keep their children home from school; some school districts have cancelled their planned broadcast of the speech.  Jim Lindgren says that the speech itself is not unprecedented and provides the text of George H.W. Bush’s 1991 speech to schoolchildren.

The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington declared victory by settling their lawsuits with the White House.  The White House will give up visitors’ logs and agrees to continue to post the logs online.

The Obama administration refused to release further information about interrogation practices, saying that, as intelligence “sources and methods,” they do not have to be disclosed, even in court.

The State Department fired its private security in Kabul, managed by Armor Group, after photos and documents emerged detailing lewd and abusive behavior by the guards.  The Project on Government Oversight called it a “Lord of the Flies environment.”  Nathan Hodge (warning: NSFW pic at link) points out that the contractors that have found themselves in trouble are usually employed by the State Department, not the Pentagon.  If you want to see the offending pictures, you may do so here (nudity and lewd behavior depicted).

(more…)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.